One thought on “Do I need to change my existing nofollows?”
Arti says:
For example, rel=”ugc sponsored” is a
perfectly valid attribute which hints that the link came from user-generated content and is
sponsored. There’s absolutely no need to change
any nofollow links that you already have. It’s also valid to use nofollow with the new attributes—which include rel=”nofollow ugc”—if
you wish to be backwards-compatible with services that don’t support the new attributes. Yes. If you use nofollow now as a way to block sponsored links, or to signify that you don’t vouch
for a page you link to, that will continue to be supported. We prefer the use
of sponsored, but either is fine and will be treated the same, for this purpose. We prefer the use
of sponsored, but either is fine and will be treat
For example, rel=”ugc sponsored” is a
perfectly valid attribute which hints that the link came from user-generated content and is
sponsored. There’s absolutely no need to change
any nofollow links that you already have. It’s also valid to use nofollow with the new attributes—which include rel=”nofollow ugc”—if
you wish to be backwards-compatible with services that don’t support the new attributes. Yes. If you use nofollow now as a way to block sponsored links, or to signify that you don’t vouch
for a page you link to, that will continue to be supported. We prefer the use
of sponsored, but either is fine and will be treated the same, for this purpose. We prefer the use
of sponsored, but either is fine and will be treat